My Apologies to Mr. Roeper
In my rage last night I complained that Richard Roeper and his column are just severely disconnected thoughts trickling from his brain without point or texture. This isn't entirely true.
It's only mostly true.
What's also true is that he's a pretty smart guy. I say that because I feel guilty and because he is, probably, smart.
By some uncanny luck, I stumbled across the column of another man. It is also basically just assorted musings in the vein of our Mr. Roeper. The stark difference is that it's brilliant.
The column appears to be written every other month or so--probably whenever the author feels like it. It appears in this magazine and it's written by Kurt Vonnegut (it's hilarious that the world's biggest luddite should have a webpage, much less an "official" one).
He's writing another novel. He's been writing it for five years. He almost seems resigned to not finishing it.
I think what makes me like Kurt Vonnegut so much is that he's so good at making people boiling mad, explosively mad. The interesting part is that he does it by asking people to respect human life and to love each other.
It's fascinating how mad this makes people.
Example:
This article is a merely a silly diatribe. I am very disappointed with the lack
of anything that i can sink my cognitive teeth in.
The election in Florda rigged? By virtually all recouning methods, Bush won. Time to get over the close call and move on!
The US feared and hated as the Nazis? Did the Nazis remove brutal dictators and spend billons of marks rebuilding the terrorized country?
The US dehumanizing millons of people? Where? If this is aimed at Iraq, it misses the mark by a lightyear!
Linking Bush to Hitler via Christianity?
Pure sleaze.
All the resources (money) has been taken by “psychopathic personalities”?
Is this really meant to be a serious article?
(BTW - i am a fan of the wonderful fiction written by KV. Welcome to the Monkey House was terrific. Perhaps he should stick to what he knows best, fiction)
Pointed. Pointed and blind.
Anyway, go to that website and search Vonnegut, there's about 8 pieces to read, they're all great. Some are more politicized than others.
This resonated with me:
“If you really want to hurt your parents, and you don’t have the nerve to be a homosexual, the least you can do is go into the arts. But do not use semicolons. They are transvestite hermaphrodites, standing for absolutely nothing. All they do is show you’ve been to college.” --Vonnegut.
Dammit he's right; I'm a failure.
1 Comments:
I'm not a huge fan of Roeper's *** columns (that's not a swear word. I would right that out. Fuck. See? I mean the ones seperated by the ***s) either. They have sort of a I'm-trying-to-make-my-deadline feel. Sometimes, there's some really interesting or hilarious stuff in there.
The columns are way better when they are long form (like todays) and just offer a window into how he's thinking about things. After reading lots of Op-Ed (and I read *plenty*), where the author tries to convince you to see their viewpoint, it's refreshing to read something opinionated. It's practically a blog sometimes.
About Vonnegut's column: I've seen it before (it's also based in Chicago, if I remember correctly), and is unabashedly left. I'm not exactly sure what 'Ken' was expecting. Also, the way to argue an opinion (and, for the most part, that's all Vonnegut was offering), is not to say, "No, that's not right" because opinions are always correct. You offer a counter-opinion, it's easy.
He (Vonnegut) was talking about Librarians. Have you heard the story about how Moore's "Stupid White Men" got published? The first 50,000 copies were printed on September 10, 2001, but none of them ever got delivered. His publisher (Regan Books, a division of HarperCollins, which is a division of News Corp, which owns Fox News, and the whole deal is owned by Rupert Murdoch) held the book hostage for five months, demanding a rewrite (you can't badmouth Bush now, the country is behind Bush, etc).
One day, a librarian named Ann Sparanese overheard him talking to someone about a call he had just received, wherein his Murdoch publisher told him that, because of his stubbornness, they were going to 'pulp' the book and that it was unlikely that he would be able to write another book because of the reputation for trouble this would give him (incidentally, I don't know how this incident would change anyone's opinion of Moore *that* much, considering how incendiary he is...). She wrote a letter to a bunch of other librarians about how his book was being 'banned,' then they wrote letters .... Anyway, his publisher was pissed about the influx of librarian hate mail and dumped the book into some bookstores with no reviews, and a three-city tour of Arligton, Denver, and someplace in Jersey.
But, the book went to number one on Amazon in hours, and had nine printings in the first five days, went on to have over fifty printings, and became a #1 New York Times Bestseller. It never would've happened without the librarian. Kind of cool.
Librarians also were quick to publicize the fact that the Department of Justice was trying to get certain documents (on how to get back property confiscated during an investigation, among other things) removed from libraries http://www.ala.org/Template.cfm?Section=News&template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=72299 .
--Mike Sheffler
Post a Comment
<< Home